The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until April of 2019. The investigation of Assange took place prior to December 2017, it is coming from the EDVA where Dana Boente was still, presumably, U.S. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to December ’17. However, on Tuesday April 15th, 2019, more investigative material was released. From a review of the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018: (The DOJ sat on the indictment for 13 months, until Mueller finished) The April 11th, 2019, Julian Assange indictment stemmed from the Eastern District of Virginia. As Mueller was using 19 lawyers, and 50 FBI investigators, Boente was/is the legal counsel to FBI Director Christopher Wray while the Mueller probe was ongoing. On January 23rd, 2018, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced Dana Boente had shifted over to the FBI to be Chief Legal Counsel (replacing James Baker) where Boente remains today. There’s no indication of when Boente actually left the DOJ-NSD or the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) role. However, the timeline gets cloudy here because Boente said he was staying on until an official replacement was announced. ♦Dana Boente was head of DOJ-NSD from May 11th, 2017 through end of October 2017 when he officially announced his intent to retire. Heck, the reason for Assange’ arrest would be brutally obvious. Butowsky is making a very serious allegation in this court filing.Īdditionally, the previously discussed motive to arrest Julian Assange would now be further enhanced. If it turns out those claims were based on falsehood, the integrity of the DOJ and Special Counsel collapses. The FBI, the DOJ and the Mueller special counsel have each purposefully claimed specific Russian actors were responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016. Department of Justice, specifically Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann and former DAG Rod Rosenstein, cannot blame a simple investigative ‘ mistake‘ for the wrong attribution of who gave the DNC emails to Wikileaks. If this information turns out to be true and accurate, the entire narrative around the DNC “hack” will have been proven to be intentionally manufactured.ĭespite the FBI’s prior admissions about never reviewing the DNC servers and despite their recent admissions about never actually seeing the forensic computer analysis, the U.S. The ramifications here are almost too large to describe.
( Source, lawsuit filing – pdf link, page 13) Additionally the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive. If this information is true and accurate, the DOJ claim of a Russian hack – based on assertions by DNC contractor, Crowdstrike– would be entirely false.
The details contained within the lawsuit filing ( full pdf below) are stunning. The lawsuit, filed by Businessman Ed Butowsky, alleges Wikileaks founder Julian Assange confirmed to Fox News analyst Ellen Ratner that the DNC leaked emails were received from Seth Rich and his brother Aaron. A rather stunning report from Gateway Pundit outlines information contained within a lawsuit filing.